If YES, the organization may have to file Form TD F 90-22.1. Wrestling Boys Varsity 22 1 4.17 0.00 Baseball Boys Jr Varsity 18 2 4.17 0.00 Basketball Boys Jr Varsity 22 1 4.17 0.00. INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC OPPORTUNITIES DISCLOSURE FORM 19.2 2018 - 2019 School Year Page 1 - Section 1: General Information Grade Pleasant Valley SD. Waiver of liability form is a general form released by any government organizations, agencies or companies that Bibliographic information is available in:22.1 Disclosure Form Pdf - besthup. The PAL indicates that all Assessments and Fees for the property have been paid. These requests are typically made by the Seller’s Attorney’s office.The opposition had been filed against the patent as a whole and was based on Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step) and Article 100(b) EPC (that the patent does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art).The Opposition Division held that it had not been proven that document D2 formed part of the prior art and thus could not be considered. The claims 1 to 22 and the amended description pages 2 and 4 as submitted during the oral proceedings held on 20. 0 551 854 in amended form on the basis of the main request, i.e. The opponent lodged an appeal against the interlocutory decision of the Opposition Division to maintain European patent No.The most relevant documents of the prior art submitted are considered to be:D2 = Notarised copy of "Optische Sensorsysteme Videomat and Optomat für industriellen Einsatz", order No. The subject-matter of the independent claims 1 and 12 was considered to be novel and inventive with respect to the remaining prior art documents submitted.III. Were considered to be admissible with respect to Article 123(2) and (3) EPC. The amendments of claims 1 and 12.Predetermined dots of the same" while in claim 12 a similar insert "and operation of said articulated arm is controlled by said control section on the basis of said coordinates, without comparing said detected image with a saved image of a model object, so as to center said gripping member in relation to said object." was added.Claims 1 and 12 of the second auxiliary request differ from claims 1 and 12 of the first auxiliary request in that the feature "without comparing said detected image with a saved image of a model object" has been omitted.Claims 1 and 3 of the third auxiliary request represent a combination of the subject-matter of claims 1, 3 and 5. A method of automatically picking up objects (4) by means of a robot (6) having an articulated arm (7) fitted with a gripping member (8) and controlled by a control section (3) characterized by the fact that it comprises stages wherein a detected image of at least one portion of said object (4) is generated by a camera (11) on said gripping member, said detected image consisting of a number of dots and wherein the coordinates of predetermined points of said detected image are determined by said control section (3)."Claims 1 and 12 of the first auxiliary request as submitted with the letter of 19 December 2003 differ from claims 1 and 12 of the main request by replacing the feature "predetermined points" of claim 1 with "predetermined dots" and inserting "and a numerical control unit (16) for receiving said coordinates and for controlling operation of said articulated arm (7) on the basis of said coordinates, without comparing said detected image with a saved image of a model object, so as to center said gripping member (8) in relation to said object (4)" after the said term ". An automatic pickup system comprising a robot (6) having an articulated arm (7) with a gripping member (8) for gripping an object (4), said articulated arm (7) being controlled by a control section (3) characterized by the fact that said gripping member (8) presents a camera (11) for generating a detected image of at least one portion of said object, said detected image consisting of a number of dots and by the fact that said control section (3) comprises processing means (20) for receiving said detected image and for determining the coordinates of predetermined points of the same.""12. The independent claims 1 and 12 of the main request submitted on 20 February 2001 under consideration read as follows:"1. Oral proceedings were held on 22 January 2004.(a) The appellant/opponent requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be revoked in its entirety.(b) The respondent/patentee requested that the appeal be dismissed or alternatively that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of either auxiliary requests 1 or 2 (claims 1 to 22 of the first or claims 1 to 22 of the second auxiliary request as filed with the letter of 19 December 2003) or on the basis of a third auxiliary request (claims 1 to 4) as submitted during the oral proceedings before the Board.V. 6, December 1987Enclosure E7 = "Richtlinien zur Erstellung von Betriebsanleitungen", Siemens, March 1986Enclosure E8 = Siemens Katalog "Bildtechnik MP 18", 1986, pages 4/8 and 4/9IV.
![]() Since document D1 comprises the corresponding reference to said document D2, anybody could order and obtain this document after document D1 had been published. It would be contrary to any experience of life that document D2 was not made available to the public. The appellant argued essentially as follows:The coding on the last page of document D2 represents the delivery date (namely month and year) of the prospectus D2 as described by document E7. However, document D1 implicitly discloses the determination of co- ordinates of predetermined points since D1 compares the deviation of the position of the detected image with the reference position and uses the said deviation for controlling the drive of the crane. The term "co-ordinate" is also not explicitly mentioned in document D1. D1, column 1, lines 62 to 66 column 2, line 32 and lines 44 to 46). Although document D1 does not mention the term "dot", it is clear to the skilled person that the image detected by the camera consists of a number of dots and is processed using digital image processing means (cf. The only disputed features of claim 1 of the main request, namely features (a) a robot having an articulated arm, (e) that the detected image consists of a number of dots, and (g) that the control section comprises processing means for determining the co-ordinates of predetermined dots, can be derived from either document D1 or D2. Download a font for word in a macFifth page, Figures (a) and (b) and sixth page, middle column to right hand column) since each image detected by the camera of the Videomat system is binarised so that each single dot thereof corresponds to a co-ordinate of the detected image. Finally, feature (g) is also disclosed by document D2 (cf. Furthermore, the skilled person when reading the disclosure of a portal crane - which represents a linear or portal robot having translational degrees of freedom - would automatically read into it the possibility of using another robot having different kinematics such as an articulated arm (implicit disclosure) and thereby obtain feature (a). 22.1 Disclosure Form Trial Robots WithoutFor transporting reels or coils such as described in document D1 the kinematics are interchangeable and are able to carry out the same movements.The first auxiliary request does not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC since the incorporated feature has no basis in the originally filed application. The objective problem starting from document D2 (remaining differences to claim 1 are features (a), (b), (c) and (d)) would be to select the robot with those kinematics which are the most suited for the intended purpose. The objective problem starting from document D1 (the remaining difference to claim 1 is feature (a)), would be to work in a smaller room and to use the resources more efficiently. The Videomat system is suitable for all industrial robots without any limitation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAngel ArchivesCategories |